Manufacturing RFQ Intake Checklist: Capture the Job Before You Quote It
A usable RFQ record separates received facts, estimator assumptions, and missing information before ambiguity becomes price or production risk.
TL;DR
Manufacturing RFQ intake should create an estimate-ready record, not merely collect attachments.
Capture customer and commercial context, the authoritative file set, quantity, material, critical features, inspection and documentation requirements, outside processes, delivery request, and every unresolved question. Label each entry as received fact, internal assumption, or missing information. End intake with one disposition: ready to estimate, clarification required, technical review, or no-bid.
Current AIURION product truth matters here: there is not a dedicated RFQ module today. Intake begins through Reports when a STEP-file analysis is part of the opportunity, or directly through Quotes for a manually created proposal. This checklist is the operating discipline to apply across those surfaces.
Skip Ahead
- Separate facts from assumptions
- Copy the RFQ intake record
- Use a disposition gate
- A filled RFQ example
- Where AIURION intake begins today
Separate Facts from Assumptions
The fastest way to corrupt an estimate is to make an assumption look like customer input.
Use three labels:
- Received fact: explicitly provided by the customer or a controlling document.
- Internal assumption: selected by the estimator to make the opportunity quotable.
- Missing information: unresolved input that could change feasibility, price, lead time, acceptance, or risk.
Example:
- Received fact: customer requested 20 pieces and supplied drawing Rev B.
- Internal assumption: quote will use 6061-T6 because the drawing calls out “aluminum” without grade.
- Missing information: no inspection report requirement was stated.
The quote may proceed with the assumption if the shop chooses, but the quote must state it and define when it will be confirmed. Intake should never silently convert it into a fact.
NIST's digital-thread work focuses on communicating product and manufacturing information across design, manufacturing, and quality activities [S1]. RFQ intake is where that thread first enters the supplier's operating workflow.
Copy the RFQ Intake Record
A. Opportunity and ownership
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| RFQ or opportunity ID | |
| Customer company and contact | |
| Estimator / opportunity owner | |
| Date received | |
| Quote due date | |
| Requested delivery date | |
| Program or end-use context, if supplied | |
| Incumbent / repeat / new work | |
| Communication channel and source |
B. Part and configuration
| Field | Entry | Label: fact / assumption / missing |
|---|---|---|
| Part number and description | ||
| Model file name, format, and revision | ||
| Drawing file name and revision | ||
| Which artifact controls if model and drawing conflict? | ||
| Units and scale confirmed | ||
| Quantity and requested price breaks | ||
| Related parts or assembly context | ||
| Superseded files identified |
C. Manufacturing requirements
| Field | Entry | Label: fact / assumption / missing |
|---|---|---|
| Material specification and allowed substitution | ||
| Critical dimensions, tolerances, and interfaces | ||
| Surface finish, coating, heat treatment, or marking | ||
| Threads, inserts, hardware, or assembly | ||
| Customer-supplied material or components | ||
| Known tooling, fixture, gauge, or programming need | ||
| Outside processes | ||
| Packaging and fulfillment |
D. Quality, documentation, and commercial conditions
| Field | Entry | Label: fact / assumption / missing |
|---|---|---|
| Inspection level and critical checks | ||
| First article or customer approval requirement | ||
| Material certs, process certs, or report package | ||
| Traceability or record-retention requirement | ||
| Customer quality clauses or supplier terms | ||
| Delivery location and shipping term | ||
| Tax, currency, payment, or validity condition | ||
| Confidentiality, access, or handling restriction |
E. Open-question register
| Question | Why it matters | Owner | Sent | Needed by | Response / disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is intentionally broader than the price calculation. It captures what production and quality will need if the quote wins.
Use a Disposition Gate
Every intake review should end with one visible state.
| Disposition | Meaning | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Ready to estimate | Required inputs are present or approved assumptions are explicit | Build route, cost, capacity, and quote |
| Clarification required | Customer answer is needed before a defensible estimate | Send owned questions and pause affected work |
| Technical review | Feasibility, process, tolerance, quality, or outside-process risk needs specialist review | Assign reviewer and decision date |
| No-bid | Capability, capacity, commercial, compliance, or strategic boundary is not met | Record reason and communicate promptly |
Do not use “in progress” as the only status. It hides whether the opportunity is waiting on the customer, engineering, estimating, or management.
Minimum estimate-ready gate
Before “Ready to estimate,” confirm:
- controlling files and revision are known;
- quantity and units are known;
- material basis is explicit;
- critical tolerances and required processes are visible;
- inspection/documentation basis is explicit;
- requested timing and delivery destination are known;
- every remaining assumption has an owner and confirmation point.
An estimator can intentionally quote with open assumptions. The gate makes that a decision instead of an accident.
A Filled RFQ Example
This example is illustrative, not a claimed customer result.
RFQ-271 requests 20 machined sensor brackets for delivery in four weeks.
| Intake item | Entry | Label |
|---|---|---|
| Customer files | SB-14.step and drawing SB-14 Rev B.pdf | Received fact |
| Quantity | 20 pieces; no price breaks requested | Received fact |
| Material | Drawing says “aluminum”; no grade | Missing information |
| Critical interface | Two mounting holes and connector keep-out are boxed on drawing | Received fact |
| Finish | “Black finish” with no process specification | Missing information |
| Inspection | No report package stated | Missing information |
| Delivery | Customer dock, requested four weeks from PO | Received fact |
| Outside process | Estimator expects anodize based on “black finish” | Internal assumption |
The open-question register becomes:
| Question | Why it matters | Owner | Needed by | Response / disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirm aluminum grade and substitution rule | Material cost, availability, and process | Estimator | Before final estimate | Pending customer |
| Confirm whether black finish means Type II anodize and identify color standard | Outside-process cost and acceptance | Estimator | Before final estimate | Pending customer |
| Confirm inspection-report expectation | Quality scope and quote notes | Quality | Before quote approval | Pending internal/customer review |
Disposition: Clarification required. Geometry analysis may continue, but the final quote should not invent material and finish as settled facts.
If this RFQ wins, the same unresolved fields should appear in the pre-release job readiness scorecard, not be rediscovered by the floor.
The Production Handoff Test
Before approving the quote, give the intake record to someone who did not estimate it and ask:
- Which files control?
- What did the customer explicitly require?
- What did the estimator assume?
- Which question remains open?
- What could change price or delivery?
- What will quality need?
- What should become part of the job packet if the work converts?
If the reviewer cannot answer from the record, intake is incomplete even if the quote total is mathematically correct.
For the downstream packet, see what belongs in a manufacturing job packet. For the governing record, see manufacturing source of truth.
Where AIURION Intake Begins Today
AIURION does not currently expose a dedicated RFQ module. The honest current workflow is:
Reports path
- Upload and analyze a supported STEP file.
- Save the analysis as a Report.
- Review the result and keep the Report detached, attach it to an existing Quote, or create a new Quote from the Report.
- Carry the resulting part details into quote line items and notes.
Quotes path
- Create a Quote directly when analysis is not the starting point.
- Select the client and add line items, discounts, tax, notes, and valid-until date.
- Use the quote review, approval, version, email/PDF, and conversion lifecycle.
The checklist above is not a claim that every RFQ field is already a first-class AIURION form field. Today, teams should use the available Report and Quote records deliberately, keep files and open questions attached to the opportunity, and put assumptions into a consistent quote-note structure.
For the current commercial surface, see AIURION manufacturing quoting software.
Recommended Next Move
Run the template against the last RFQ that produced production confusion. Add the first missing fact to the standard intake review and define its disposition rule.
If the gap sits between STEP analysis, Quote creation, and production handoff, request a focused AIURION RFQ-intake pilot around that path.
References
[S1] NIST - Digital Thread for Manufacturing [Link]